Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INAANI Pte. Ltd.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- INAANI Pte. Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article of non notable company listing events attended by company executives as achievement. No reliable sources about any substantial coverage of this firm. Declined 2 times at AFC submission as advert and not notable. The author feels he can no longer wait and moved it to main space. Ammarpad (talk) 06:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 07:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 07:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: This is WP:SOAPBOX, not a completely quantity notable sources of WP:encyclopedia, the article need to be rewritten. SA 13 Bro (talk) 07:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article featuring the we-voice to present the company's wares, supported by press releases. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG. References are not intellectually independent and fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 14:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Spam / promo. Poorly sourced. Need an SPI on the account that created it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per all above, they really should have listened to the advice at AfC. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:01, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.