Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Resource Maps
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- India Resource Maps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not sure what the subject of this article is intended to be - the title is ungrammatical and unclear, and the content is already covered in Natural resources in India. A prod notice was removed without any explanation and the article creator and sole contributor Sreejithcv (talk · contribs) has not responded to a request to clarify the article's scope. Abecedare (talk) 19:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Its an Image based article construes more on geopolitical resources useful to erudite —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.164.155.66 (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as duplicate of structured articles including Biosphere reserves of India, Outline of India etc. Couple of these maps were added to other pages but reverted due to inconsistency and/or the lack of sourcing for the information in the map and the editor then created this new page. At this point, this article in addition to duplicating content from other pages, provides no context and has an incorrect title. The maps also contain information that isn't sourced - area rankings (no reason to believe it is incorrect though), WNRB status etc. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 21:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, covered in other articles. Priyanath talk 19:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - seems to be a vehicle to show off some maps. Actual information covered in other more appropriate articles. -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.